Sunday, March 14, 2010

Keep The Heat On

There are only two political parties in Israel, really, the party that dreads the loss of Greater Israel, i.e., the party of settlements, and, the party that dreads the isolation of global Israel, i.e., the party of America. Think of the country as paradigms, the first focused on Jerusalem's fire, the second on Tel Aviv's cool. The Likud is mainly in the first party, as are all of Netanyahu's coalition partners, save Labor. But the prime minister supposed he could keep a leg in both, or at least preclude the need for Israelis to choose, by focusing everybody, including American diplomats and generals, on the dread of Iran--also by activating neoconservative allies in the United States to downplay settlement activity in the face of Islamist violence.

Netanyahu's stance, or ploy, finally came unraveled last week, not only because of the dustup with Joe Biden about new construction in East Jerusalem, but because Gen. David Petraeus finally weighed in with a statement of the obvious, that America's long acquiescence in Israel's occupation "was jeopardizing U.S. standing in the region." Netanyahu is trying to pretend that the crisis with Washington was precipitated by bad timing. That's a little like saying the announcement of AIG's bonus pool was bad timing. Nobody's really buying it, and with Petreaus in the mix, the neocons can hardly sell it. We have come to a moment of truth that is long overdue. The Israeli media is, gratefully, growing preoccupied with its implications, not the least of which is just how divided the country is, and how its citizens must indeed choose.

REVEALINGLY, BIDEN'S GOOD speech at Tel Aviv University last week spent a good deal of time anticipating (or preempting) Netanyahu on Iran, reassuring Israelis-in-general about their existence-in-general. But this sounded more like a preliminary hymn than the necessary sermon. The university is ground zero of the America party. Biden looked a little surprised when he found that his only strong applause line was an unequivocal condemnation of new Jewish settlements, which would further "prejudice the result of negotiations." This caused Knesset Speaker Ruby Rivlin, the hack conscience of the settlers party, to issue a condemnation of his own, namely, of the Tel Aviv University audience.

The point is, there is a culture war in Israel now, and the only way the liberal side of it can mount an offensive is if America keeps the heat on. It is futile to treat Israel as if it were the embodiment of some big Jewish psyche in need of reassurances to trust the world. In fact, Israeli governments refuse to depart from the status quo because a large and hardened minority, perhaps a third of Jewish Israelis, regards peace as an end to the divinely self-enclosed way of life they have established in and around Jerusalem. The squishy, declining, more cosmopolitan and secular majority is unwilling to confront them for the sake of Palestinians, that is, not unless they have to. Israelis have to see that there is something to lose.

NOBODY HERE KNOWS how violently the Israeli right would be prepared to defend the settlement project against the Israeli state itself. To the extent that Israeli politics are merely electoral politics, the fight is clear, however. It is over swing voters: immigrants from the former Soviet Union and their acculturated children, better educated Mizrahim, traditionalist Jews drawn to orthodoxy but who have traveled the world. In recent years--what with the collapse of Oslo, the suicide bombings, the rise of Ahmadinejad, etc.--these voters have swung sharply toward the settlers. A recent poll of high school students reveals that over half would deny Arab citizens of Israel the right to vote. To be for peace, you see, is to be naïve, trusting of "the Arabs."

The global party can win back the initiative, but this means giving swing voters something new and more urgent to be not naïve about, something like reliance on Likud, AIPAC, etc., to deliver America. Reports of Clinton dressing down Netanyahu on the phone were just a beginning. Labor's dissident former leader, Amir Peretz, was on Reshet Bet radio this morning sounding charged up for the first time in two years. He told listeners it was time to "grow up." There are rumors that Kadima's Tzipi Livni has sent Netanyhau a message that she'll join the government if he gets rid of Shas and Leiberman, in effect, if he is prepared to try to drag the whole of the Likud to the party of America, even if this means he loses absolute control over the cabinet. This is his moment of truth. If Washington lets up, critics of government policy will slump back into their corner.

THE NEXT TWO weeks may prove critical. Netanyahu is coming to Washington, or is at least scheduled to, to address the AIPAC convention. Meanwhile, Obama's international prestige will be riding on his final push to get healthcare legislation passed. The EU's foreign minister, Catherine Ashton, has rebuked Israel and strongly backed Clinton's stand over Jerusalem construction. Kadima is waiting for an answer. The Arab League is meeting in Tripoli later this month, and who knows if their 2002 offer of full regional peace with Israel, in exchange for the 1967 borders and a resolution of the refugees issue, will be renewed?

Meanwhile, in Jerualem, plans are proceeding to have Ruby Rivlin rededicate an ancient synagogue in the old city today. Arab men under 50 are being kept away from the mosques, and everyone is bracing for the closures of the Passover holiday. The anticipated proximity negotiations of George Mitchell have been deferred. There is talk of a temporary general strike. There are fresh riots at Birzeit University in Ramallah. The region, in short, will not be the same a month from now. Even the effort to reimpose the status quo ante Biden will seem a provocation.

Like all administrations since Ronald Reagan, Obama's will be tempted to have representatives to AIPAC mollify what seems the natural leadership of American Jews, though AIPAC is not anything of the kind. The temptation must be resisted. Perhaps this was inadvertent, but there is now an expectation across the West Bank, and the Israeli political class, that Washington has, in effect, finally told Israel to stop all settlements, period, even in East Jerusalem. If ever Obama needed the realism and nerves that Eisenhower had when he told Ben-Gurion to vacate Sinai, this is the time. Peretz told the radio that the government has "dried the brush," so that any match can light a wildfire. Obama's return to business as usual, that is, to the inertia from which only the Israeli right gains, can itself provide the spark.

15 comments:

Y. Ben-David said...

The insistence of the Palestinians on all sorts of unilateral concessions before negotiations start is the biggest proof that they have no intention of reaching any sort of peace agreement. IF they don't like the settlements and want Jerusalem, they can ask for them at the negotiations and you and I know they will get them IF THEY GIVE UP THE PALESTINIAN RIGHT OF RETURN. Tom Friedman wrote in his last column the terms the US wants to see of an agreement..."the terms everyone knows" and yet he forgets to add that Olmert offered them this, but Abbas rejected it. Thus, there won't be any agreement. All the Obama-Clinton-Axelrod tongue lashings against Israel do is to make Arab and intransigence violence more certain. Maybe they will succeed in bringing down Bibi as was done in 1999. Did it bring peace then? NO. And it won't now.

Potter said...

Israel's defiance of international law, growing itself on lands that were occupied in '67 designated for a Palestinian state (that reflects losses of '48), cannot continue at the same time as negotiations which demand faith and trust.

Suppose terrorists began bombings within Israel, or concerted attacks upon the settlements. Would Palestinians then have a right to say during this chaos, that Israel could ask for a cessation at the negotiations?

Building on this occupied land is incitement.

Why should Israel be allowed to continue to incite via settlement growth? it's not as if Israel is being asked for an evacuation of all settlements before talks can begin.

What is being asked is for no further incitement.

-----------------
Regarding Olmert's excellent "offer":

I doubt were the tables turned that Israeli's would accept such an offer. Nor would such an offer, proposed by a leader being hounded out of office ( under indictment), not backed up by the US (in other words not very real) be acceptable.

Though it was inadequate but a possible starting point Olmert was a lame duck. Foreign minister Livni ( effectively in power at the time) said that Palestinians should not do the deal. Then the Gaza War came a few months later.

So why should the Palestinians have taken it seriously even if they loved it completely knowing that Olmert's government was coming to an end?

Larry said...

An excellent column. The only thing that doesn't work for me is the metaphoric structure. Given the choice between Jerusalem's "fire" and Tel-Aviv's "cool," by temperament I'll choose the fire - though my political views are aligned with Tel-Aviv.

Ralph said...

THIS COMES AS NO SURPRISE GIVEN BIDEN'S EXPRESSED AND OVERT SYMPATHY FOR TERRORISTS!!!!

Anonymous said...

Egon B.E. Friberger (pseudonym)
Brussels (Belgium)


Ultra-diplomacy against global humiliation

PM Netanyahu kept steering ultra-diplomatically with great statesmanship while Ms. Clinton, Mr. Biden and Mr. Obama kept humiliating him in the global theatre by dictating how to run his country in a way fluoroscopic of three Palestinian fingerprint pinpoints: content (destruction superior to construction), style (havoc at any opportunity) and attitude (havoc against any initiative). A free people in a country of their own could not even inaugurate in serenity a synagogue. Affection blackmail in friendships wrecks diplomatic relations. Who’s to blame? Who declines (direct) talks?

ibrahim said...

Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat

Ross said...

christian louboutin shoeschristian louboutin shoes
christian louboutin bootschristian louboutin boots
christian louboutin sandalschristian louboutin sandals
christian louboutin slingbackchristian louboutin slingback
christian louboutin sneakerschristian louboutin sneakers
christian louboutin wedgeschristian louboutin wedges
christian louboutin weddingchristian louboutin wedding
timberland bootstimberland boots
asics shoesasics shoes
asics running shoesasics running shoes
dsquared jeans mendsquared jeans men
dsquared shoes 2011dsquared shoes 2011
karen millen dresseskaren millen dresses
marque t shirtmarque t shirt

slw1111 said...

And, a absolute one from cheap louis vuitton handbags comes with a key set and engraved lock. It could about-face out to be the dispatch rock appear your next promotion, a way to get the guy of your dreams, a address in which to accomplish an absolute account and all of these are accessible if you accept the appropriate angel about you.

abercrombiefitch said...

the iconic sneaker was originally introduced on now.
Nike Air Max 2011
Nike Air Max Shoes
Nike Air Max
Nike Air Max Wildwood Supreme
Nike Air Max Turbulence
Nike Air Max Skyline
Nike Air Max Goadome
Nike Air Max Fitsole
Nike Air Max Zenyth
Nike Air Max Boots
Nike Air Max Zoom Kobe
Nike Air Max Tn
Nike Air Max LTD
Nike Air Max Presto
Nike Air Max BW
Nike Air Max 24 7
Nike Air Max 2010
Nike Air Max 2011
Nike Air Max 2009
Nike Air Max 95
Nike Air Max 91
Nike Air Max 87
Nike Air Max 180
Nike Air Max Griffey Max 1
Nike Air Max 90
Nike Air Max 1
Abercrombie and Fitch London
Abercrombie & Fitch Clothes
Vibram Shoes
Cheap Air Max
Nike Air Max Shoes
is available in a vivid array of colors, including, Jiffy Black, Pigeon Grey, Shell White, Dodger Blue, and Beaver Brown.

jersey shore season 4 said...

Grea tpost thanks

watch jersey shore said...

Great read thanks

New nike soccer shoes said...

Ah good exciting content! Will always come to our attention. To bring you good news-works perfect! New nike soccer shoes best shoes 2011!!

nike mercurial soccer cleats said...

Ah good exciting content! Will always come to our attention. To bring you good news-works perfect! So how is the Nike Football Cleats cleatschanged? the original Nike Speed boot!New products Nike Mercurial Vapor Superfly for us.the new Vapor football boots have undergone the same new paint work as the nike mercurial vapor superfly III and now feature the Nike Football Boots updated asymmetric.

luck said...

uggs clearance Reputation of ugg boots is prevalent on account of their comfort and ease and fashion. In the course of the coldest of weather, uggs will preserve your foot heat and dry. The traditional ugg boots have become so broadly accepted that you will uncover several low-priced ugg boots. Be careful, Uggs Outlet many corporations have completed a knock off of these boots to generate cheat ugg boots.Verify Low cost Uggs Boots MaterialsIf you discover low-priced ugg boot's ensure you happen to be acquiring real sheepskin, and the sole of the boot is made quite similar to the Australian Ugg boots.A lot of businesses make ugg look-alike's that contains elements that aren't sheepskin ugg boots clearance.

ekle paylas said...

nice blog Thanks for sharing. voicesohbet was really very nice.
sesli chat siteleri sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslichat seslisohbet
sesli siteleri chat siteleri
sohbet siteleri sesli siteler
voice sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli sohbet seslisohbet
sohbet siteleri sesli chat siteleri
seslichat sesli chat
herkesburda herkes burda
sohbetmerkezi sohbetmerkezi